best automated forex trading software 2017

with real-time and intraday data. , users worldwide. + technical indicators, custom indicators, spreads and much more. Reliable datafeed and.

Horizontal lines allow you to draw the trend price channel support and resistance lines. Breaking these levels is usually a sign of a trend change in the Forex market. Trend lines allow assessing the current trend. In the graph below, we show support and resistance levels using the red and green lines:. It is a universal tool that allows you not only to automatically build various lines, waves and levels on a currency pair chart, but also determines necessary parameters such as market condition, the direction and strength of the trend, and even alerts you to the upcoming reversal.

Indicators can be considered as the primary tools for technical analysis. Let's look at an example: how Stochastic Oscillator works. From levels 20 and 80 there are two horizontal levels, below and above which oversold and overbought zones, respectively, are located.

So, if the solid line crosses the dashed one from the bottom up, then you need to open a buy order, if from top to bottom - a sell order.

1. The Highs and Lows Tell the (Whole) Story

It is the simplest example of using indicators. Each of them has many signals and applications. JustForex team recommends you to learn how to apply them before putting into practice. Technical analysis patterns or chart patterns gives a possibility to analyze and supplement your analysis qualitatively. As you know, charts of currency pairs follow certain trends.

How to predict forex movements

So with the help of patterns, it is possible to predict both the continuation of the trend and its reversal. For each of them, there are rules for entering the market. Let's look at the example of Triple Top. Triple Top is a figure of technical analysis of financial markets, including the Forex market, which is formed after a long uptrend and indicates a possible reversal of the trend. If the price falls below the support level a particular deviation is acceptable , the formation of the model is considered complete.

A sell signal appears, and the trend direction is expected to change. So, as you can see, technical analysis presents plenty of ways how to use its tools in practice and predict price movements. All is in your hands. A variety of web terminals and specialized software makes a choice of a trading platform a difficult one for a novice trader. What should be this vital decision based on?

To begin with, it is necessary to highlight the main criteria that high-quality software must meet for making money on financial markets What is technical analysis?

The basic are three postulates: Market price takes into account everything. In the current quotation and market movement, all tendencies, sentiment of participants and other factors that may influence the formation of the current price are already taken into account.

EurJpy Analysis today - 4H time frame analysis

History repeats. We can interpret this metric such that it gives the ratio of the number of profitable transactions over the total number of transactions, defined using Table 2. In the below formula, the following values are used:. After applying the labeling algorithm, we obtained a balanced distribution of the three classes over the data set. This algorithm calculates different threshold values for each period and forms different sets of class distributions.

For predictions of different periods, the thresholds and corresponding number of data points explicitly via training and test sets in each class are calculated, as shown in Table 3. This table shows that the class distributions of the training and test data have slightly different characteristics. While the class decrease has a higher ratio in the training set and a lower ratio in the test set, the class increase shows opposite behavior.

This is because a split is made between the training and test sets without shuffling the data sets to preserve the order of the data points. We used the first days of this data to train our models and the last days to test them. If one of these is predicted, a transaction is considered to be started on the test day ending on the day of the prediction 1, 3, or 5 days ahead.

Otherwise, no transaction is started.


  • Understanding the Trading Cycles in Forex Market;
  • hedging strategies for binary options;
  • tommys revenge trading system!
  • Actual Predictions?

A transaction is successful and the traders profit if the prediction of the direction is correct. For time-series data, LSTM is typically used to forecast the value for the next time point. It can also forecast the values for further time points by replacing the output value with not the next time point value but the value for the chosen number of data points ahead. This way, during the test phase, the model predicts the value for that many time points ahead. However, as expected, the accuracy of the forecast usually diminishes as the distance becomes longer.

They defined it as an n-step prediction as follows:.


  • pound rupee forex rate!
  • Predicting a Forex Market Direction - Forex education on ?
  • A jargon-free guide to commonly used tools;
  • 2 Preliminary?

They performed experiments for 1, 3, and 5 days ahead. In their experiments, the accuracy of the prediction decreased as n became larger. We also present the number of total transactions made on test data for each experiment. Accuracy results are obtained for transactions that are made.

For each experiment, we performed 50, , , and iterations in the training phases to properly compare different models. The execution times of the experiments were almost linear with the number of iterations.

Forex Daily Forecasts

For our data set, using a typical high-end laptop MacBook Pro, 2. As seen in Table 4 , this model shows huge variance in the number of transactions. Additionally, the average predicted transaction number is For this LSTM model, the average predicted transaction number is The results for this model are shown in Table 6. The average predicted transaction number is One major difference of this model is that it is for iterations.

For this test case, the accuracy significantly increased, but the number of transactions dropped even more significantly. In some experiments, the number of transactions is quite low. Basically, the total number of decrease and increase predictions are in the range of [8, ], with an overall average of When we analyze the results for one-day-ahead predictions, we observe that although the baseline models made more transactions Table 8 presents the results of these experiments.

One significant observation concerns the huge drop in the number of transactions for iterations without any increase in accuracy. Furthermore, the variance in the number of transactions is also smaller; the average predicted transaction number is There is a drop in the number of transactions for iterations but not as much as with the macroeconomic LSTM. The results for this model are presented in Table However, the case with iterations is quite different from the others, with only 10 transactions out of a possible generating a very high profit accuracy.

On average, this value is However, all of these cases produced a very small number of transactions. When we compare the results, similar to the one-day-ahead cases, we observe that the baseline models produced more transactions more than The results of these experiments are shown in Table Table 13 shows the results of these experiments. Again, the case of iterations shows huge differences from the other cases, generating less than half the number of the lowest number of transactions generated by the others. Table 14 shows the results of these experiments.

Meanwhile, the average predicted transaction number is However, the case of iterations is not an exception, and there is huge variance among the cases. From the five-days-ahead prediction experiments, we observe that, similar to the one-day- and three-days-ahead experiments, the baseline models produced more transactions more than This extended data set has data points, which contain increases and decreases overall. Applying our labeling algorithm, we formed a data set with a balanced distribution of three classes. Table 16 presents the statistics of the extended data set.

Below, we report one-day-, three-days-, and five-days-ahead prediction results for our hybrid model based on the extended data. The average the number of predictions is The total number of generated transactions is in the range of [2, 83]. Some cases with iterations produced a very small number of transactions. The average number of transactions is Table 19 shows the results for the five-days-ahead prediction experiments.

Interestingly, the total numbers predictions are much closer to each other in all of the cases compared to the one-day- and three-days-ahead predictions. These numbers are in the range of [59, 84]. On average, the number of transactions is Table 20 summarizes the overall results of the experiments. However, they produced 3.

In these experiments, there were huge differences in terms of the number of transactions generated by the two different LSTMs.

Characteristics of a Trending Market

As in the above case, this higher accuracy was obtained by reducing the number of transactions to Moreover, the hybrid model showed an exceptional accuracy performance of Also, both were higher than the five-days-ahead predictions, by 5. The number of transactions became higher with further forecasting, for It is difficult to form a simple interpretation of these results, but, in general, we can say that with macroeconomic indicators, more transactions are generated.

The number of transactions was less in the five-days-ahead predictions than in the one-day and three-day predictions. The transaction number ratio over the test data varied and was around These results also show that a simple combination of two sets of indicators did not produce better results than those obtained individually from the two sets. Hybrid model : Our proposed model, as expected, generated much higher accuracy results than the other three models.

Moreover, in all cases, it generated the smallest number of transactions compared to the other models The main motivation for our hybrid model solution was to avoid the drawbacks of the two different LSTMs i. Some of these transactions were generated with not very good signals and thus had lower accuracy results. Although the two individual baseline LSTMs used completely different data sets, their results seemed to be very similar.

The 5 Ways to Predict Movement in the Forex Market

Even though LSTMs are, in general, quite successful in time-series predictions, even for applications such as stock price prediction, when it comes to predicting price direction, they fail if used directly. Moreover, combining two data sets into one seemed to improve accuracy only slightly. For that reason, we developed a hybrid model that takes the results of two individual LSTMs separately and merges them using smart decision logic. That is why incorrect directional predictions made by LSTMs correspond to a very small amount of errors.